Alan Dershowitz's Dancing Israelis, Desires to Do War Crimes on Iran, and Fellow Zio-Cons Obstructing release of 9/11 Reports!

an Israeli 'employee' once remarked: "Give us twenty (20) years and we'll take over your media and destroy your country."

0. My Email To Alan Dershowitz

1`. DANCING ISRAELIS | Declassified FBI Report

full text of fbi report | 141 pages

2. Withheld from 9/11 Commission | Saudi Support for Hijackers in LA! and SD!

Biden Declassifies Secret Report FBI ENCORE OPERATIONS and Detailing Saudi Nationals' Connections To 9/11

3. Shea Memorandum to 9/11 Commission RE Israeli Spying & Failure to Warn

4. Alan says BOMB Iran again & again...videos - Alan promotes War Crimes and Discredity Carl Schmitt 'legitimacy' v. legality

means justify the ends - legitimacy v. legality (see caption on INSS video)

#0 EMAIL to Alan Dershowitz RE His Anti-Americanism and Holocaust Denial

RE: Dershowitz Harvard Goebbals Ambassador of Hatred, Holocausting, Pogromming and KILLING COPS and FIREFIGHTERS--Dancing Israeli

Key Documents RE 9/11 & Israel involvement/failure to warn

[link to webpage with full email text and referenced documents ATTACHED]

FBI- Operation Encore
FBI- Dancing Israelis
9/11 Commission - Shea Memorandum

How HItler of you to Hustle for Zio-Con ethno-religious-nationalists war criminals while being Harvard's Ambassador of Anti-Americanism in your promotion of War Crimes, Holocaust Denial, Racist anti-American stances on Affirmative Action and DEI.

In short, there is little to distinguish you from "Dancing Israelis" filming themselves celebrating with the burning Twin Towers in what they referred to as ‘the incident’ of 9/11 hijackers they had advance knowledge of but did not share because they HATE America; they HATE NYPD, HATE NYFD. You are just a terrorist like them in sportscoat. You may have been born a Brooklyn Jews, but now you’re a seditious-treasonous agent of a hostile government allowed to operate freely and openly because of the corruption in our institutions that Chabad-cons and Heil-lel Cons are aiding and betting with their plutocratic backers.

I am not surprised to see again promote bombing Iran in a recent TV Debate where you again promote Netanyahu's Nazi 3-decade pre-occupation as you did 10 years ago at a Zio-con INSS thinkless-tank

Let me remind you

of your venom directed at civil liberties groups, under-represented minorities, and Pro-American Jews for justice RIGHT here in the United States.

of your hatred and enthusiasm for war crimes including starving Palestinians and bombing Iranians.

about your advocacy for Jeff Epstein and other child abusers but your vitriolic hateful, Jew-Hating, Nazi-propaganda, often directed at peace-loving Jewish Americans and African Americans who had been strong allies of Jewish causes before the anti-Black Right-wing-ADL Jews became dominant political voice.

of your naked "Hasbara" propaganda on behalf of a hostile foreign regime is equal to or worse than Dancing Israelis celebrating the Attack on America! You were born American but have given your loyalty to a foreign power, or perhaps like Finkelstein just to your pocketbook (he had a beautiful home).

While there are no allegations of you being at the scene with your fellow Zio-Cons high-fiving and dancing and celebrating the destruction of the Twin Towers on 9/11, you certainly were present on their van roof-top in spirit!

You belong in JAIL Alan—Like Arthur Finkelstein who when told he’d change the world responded, “And I made it worse.” You Dershowitz sold out New York. You shill for 9/11 plotters in Tel Aviv and those who carried out the attack on the USS Liberty. Zio-Con Israelis should be EXPELLED. The American Zio-Cons like you have to be closely monitored, and potentially renditioned for further counter-intelligence gathering.

#1 Bibi's Spy Columbia Biz School Assistant Professor Shai Davidai--He quacks like a duck, walk likes a duck, ,and therefore Shai Davidai--a prominently featured as a "peace-lover" in the media which is like calling Hitler a Jew-Lover.

#2 BiBi's plot to Bomb Iran? Dershowitz says BOMB BOMB BOMB IRAN. [This is His Opportunity! in time of 'crisis']

Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (retro from 2010) Urges You and Your Neighbors to Contact You Congressional Representatives today!!! Tell them NO to BOMBING IRAN. Israel is the psychopath possessing a nuclear arsenal (the country is nothing more than a military base for colonial powers). Israel should be DISARMED; Its Nuclear weapons DISMANTLED ASAP. Israel is the rogue nation, the Nazi Nation. Obama catered to Zio-Cons. I call for the END of Zio-Con and for a one-state solution. You are a WAR CRIMINAL, and a TERRORIST Imperialist Threat. See attached warning about Your War-with-Iran propaganda in the Washington Report Alert on Middle East Affairs. All call your Congress folk b/c Bibi begging for war in Iran again

Regards

Bryan Gobin

[link to webpage with full email text and referenced documents & ATTACHMENTS]

ATTACHMENT

1) Email to Bibi's Spy at Columbia University who is a serial harasser of students, Tweets nasty vile terrorist threats, and is himself most likely Mossad--his angry tweets about his employers are repeated on Israeli government websites.

2) Warning to Congress about Dershowitz propagandizing for an imminent pre-emptive Bibi Bombing Iran Again (from 2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs)

---see Attachments in Drop-Downs Below

#1 Attachment | Assistant Columbia Professor "SPY" Shai Davidai - Bibi's Boy in the Ivory Tower

ATTACHMENT

=============Sent today to Columbia==========

To Columbia Business School, Assistant Prof Shai Davidai

Assistant Professor Shai Spy Davidai--Zionist, Cold-Blooded Killer, Husband, Father, Goebbals:

cc: fbi new york, fbi los angeles. LA DA (read your own report please..otherwise I’ll CHARGE you my usual contract fee...)

Columbia Business School clearly considers "Anti-American" to be a good fit for their faculty since at least two Israel Proud Nazi Zio-Cons are Assistant Professors. DEI @CBS? Detention-Expulsion-Incineration? Novel 'Zionist revisionism' in action!

Planning to have new faculty "recruiting KKK lynch-ins" next? CBS--we hire from A for Al-Qaeda to Z for Zio-Cons.

RE attitudes toward Americans of your 9/11 Mossad Pals: Comment from former employee of Urban Moving (Weehawken NJ) quoted in 9/11 Dancing Israeli FBI report regarding the hostile-to-American work environment created by Mossad. The ex-American employee said an Israeli 'employee' once remarked: " "Give us twenty (20) years and we'll take over your media and destroy your country."

See if you can find the 1) 'Shea' report on Israeli spying to the 9/11 commission and the 2) Declassified FBI report on the Dancing Israelis pre-positioned as early as 8AM to 'high-five' the crash in the Towers....NOT HASBARA--

The "Dancing Israelis" had been on-site on 9/10. There were three witnesses interviewed confirming first-hand sighting of he Israelis dancing and hugging and High-fiving at the sight of our World Trade Centers being bombed. One lied to police when they were detained about their whereabouts--they said Westside Hwy, not Union City NJ at the Doric Tower where at least one witnessed observed them pre-positioned to watch the show.

In full context....

FBI REPORT, DECLASSIFIED

QUOTE from the Report regarding Mossad front in NJ: "Urban Moving Systems"

"A former Urban Moving Systems [a front for Mosad] employee later contacted the Newark Division with information indicating that he had quit his employment with Urban Moving Systems due to high amount of anti-American sentiment present among Urban's employees. The former employee stated that an Israeli employee of Urban had even once remarked, The former employee stated that an Israeli employee of Urban had even once remarked, "Give us twenty (20) years and we'll take over your media and destroy your country."

Before 7 October I thought Israelis were human. Now I know many Israelis are terrorists and 9/11 plotting Zio-Cons who are malignant, narcissistic, psychopath velociraptors.
Remember what you called the students: 9/11 hijackers and terrorists.
Recall the Russian adage, "The worst thiief yells 'thief' the loudest while pointing the finger to the least culpable and most vulnerable."
You yell loudest! You are a 9/11 hijacker; a Dancing Israeli taking over our media just as Mossad colleague said 25 years ago. You are destroying my country.

The world collectively must wipe out the scourge of Zionism as an ideology in Palestine, the United States, and everywhere ese. Israelis are not American Jews—they are Israelis with their own history and culture of Nazism. Far too many are idolatrous with their red heifers and their absurd covenant which is really code for covetousness. Greedy, entitled, arrogant, incompetent, annoying, complaining, whining losers whose God in disgust punished them with 40-years Wandering in the desert --which I Have mapped out for you on page dedicated "The Long Walk to Freedom that Never Happened." Subtitle: The True Text of the "People of the Text '' who have nothing else to show other than precious scrolls of arguments recording God’s punishments of them during their time in Palestine. (Salman Rushdie, eat your heart out!)

In contrast, the mosaic of groups that have created culture and civilization. Romans left ruins of temples, roads, and aqueducts. Jews nothing but rocks, paper, and destruction when they left 2000 years ago and they are destroying everything beautiful that was created in their absence.

I also included on this page a ChatGPT original briefing to the UN SEcurity Council about genocides committed by God or by people against other people in the Torah.

...The Wandering in the Desert---a possible case of genocide! Yahweh doesn't like his chosen people so Much! Always Holocausting chosen people. And no matter whether you have the most advanced military in the history of the Med; highly trained soldiers, and a super-natural U.S. urging you to BE BRAVE…and just like in Biblical times, the pathetic Hebrews can’t even beat invisible Hamas….Excuse, I mean Holocaust 2.2 million Gazans---Seriously—7 months and you have MURDERED them all yet just like you did to the U.S. sailors on the U.S.S. Liberty? See my profile page.. Israel is 100 percent at fault, and deliberately, intentionally sought sink and kill all aboard! 8 hours of surveillance, and Israel says, oopsies, we couldn’t see the giant flag or calculate speed or read…Trust us, we’re just the stupidest bunch of Master-Race jerk-offs to ever set sail---yet we have a nuclear arsenal—which is INSANE…and MUST end.

You 9/11 Israeli-cold-blooded killing machine---velociraptor. You hate America. You can’t STAND our FREEDOM. You can’t STAND Democracy and EQUALITY and RULE of LAW. You’re a Nazi-Neanderthal-

Why do you think I reached out to you out of know where just like the Israeli 'art students' (DEA) did to their targets? I knew who you were from the beginning....

Do you know who I work for? THE USA BABY BOY....Independent Operator. Patriotic Service. Self-Employed on the Westside! Ask my Ex-wife Harvard Neuroscientist about my credentials. Any institution that employs Alan Dershowitz is full of rot.

Warm Regards,

B.C. Gobin

#2 Attachment | Warning to Congress about Dershowitz propagandizing for an imminent pre-emptive Bibi Bombing Iran Again

(from 2010 issue Washington Report on Middle East Affairs)

Attachment#2

1902 18th St NW • Washington, DC 20009 | (800) 368-5788 • Fax: (202) 265-4574

ACTION ALERT

August 5, 2010

Contact: newseditor@wrmea.com

Dear Readers,

From <https://www.wrmea.org/action-alert-archives/israel-may-drag-u.s.-into-another-war.html>

Dear Friends,

We have disturbing and urgent news. Our new executive director, Philip Giraldi, and other former U.S. intelligence officers have just published an extremely important analysis warning that Israel may plan to attack Iran as early as this month (full-length article below).

They detail the evidence for this possibility and warn that such an action would quite likely drag the United States into yet another tragic, needless, and disastrous quagmire. It would be a war that Israel would begin and the United States would have to finish.

Fortunately, they also describe actions that President Obama could take to prevent this.

1. We urge you to circulate this information widely.

2. Also, please contact the White House and your Congressional representatives to tell them that you do not want another costly and profoundly tragic war. Explain that you desire that the U.S. issue a clear demand that Israel NOT attack Iran and instead allow the various excellent diplomatic initiatives to defuse the situation to move forward.

Our radio program “CNI: Jerusalem Calling” will discuss this topic TODAY at noon eastern time. CNI President Alison Weir will be the host with Executive Director Philip Giraldi and CIA intelligence officer Raymond McGovern as the guests. Mr. McGovern served as an intelligence officer in the CIA for almost thirty years and prepared the President’s Daily Brief during both the Reagan administration and the first Bush administration. He has also published a number of articles and is one of the founding members of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS), a group of former and current officials in the intelligence community that got together in 2003 to protest the use of faulty intelligence leading up to the Iraq War.

To listen: go to the show’s homepage and click on the “Listen Live” button for Studio A, at the top left.

Call in: with your questions and comments during the second half of the show by calling 877-474-3302, toll-free International users can call 858-678-8958 or Skypename: WSRADIOSTUDIO.

Below is the article, by Ray McGovern:

MEMORANDUM FOR: The President

FROM: Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS)

SUBJECT: War With Iran

We write to alert you to the likelihood that Israel will attack Iran as early as this month. This would likely lead to a wider war. Israel’s leaders would calculate that once the battle is joined, it will be politically untenable for you to give anything less than unstinting support to Israel, no matter how the war started, and that U.S. troops and weaponry would flow freely. Wider war could eventually result in destruction of the state of Israel. This can be stopped, but only if you move quickly to preempt an Israeli attack by publicly condemning such a move before it happens.

We believe that comments by senior American officials, you included, reflect misplaced trust in Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. Actually, the phrasing itself can be revealing, as when CIA Director Panetta implied cavalierly that Washington leaves it up to the Israelis to decide whether and when to attack Iran, and how much “room” to give to the diplomatic effort. On June 27, Panetta casually told ABC’s Jake Tapper, “I think they are willing to give us the room to be able to try to change Iran diplomatically ... as opposed to changing them militarily.”

Similarly, the tone you struck referring to Netanyahu and yourself in your July 7 interview with Israeli TV was distinctly out of tune with decades of unfortunate history with Israeli leaders. “Neither of us try to surprise each other,” you said, “and that approach is one that I think Prime Minister Netanyahu is committed to.” You may wish to ask Vice President Biden to remind you of the kind of surprises he has encountered in Israel.?Blindsiding has long been an arrow in Israel’s quiver. During the emerging Middle East crisis in the spring of 1967, some of us witnessed closely a flood of Israeli surprises and deception, as Netanyahu’s predecessors feigned fear of an imminent Arab attack as justification for starting a war to seize and occupy Arab territories. We had long since concluded that Israel had been exaggerating the Arab “threat”- well before 1982 when former Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin publicly confessed:”In June 1967, we had a choice. The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that [Egyptian President] Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.” Israel had, in fact, prepared well militarily and also mounted provocations against its neighbors, in order to provoke a response that could be used to justify expansion of its borders.?Given this record, one would be well advised to greet with appropriate skepticism any private assurances Netanyahu may have given you that Israel would not surprise you with an attack on Iran.

Netanyahu’s Calculations

Netanyahu believes he holds the high cards, largely because of the strong support he enjoys in our Congress and our strongly pro-Israel media. He reads your reluctance even to mention in controversial bilateral issues publicly during his recent visit as affirmation that he is in the catbird seat in the relationship. During election years in the U.S. (including mid-terms), Israeli leaders are particularly confident of the power they and the Likud Lobby enjoy on the American political scene.

This prime minister learned well from Menachem Begin and Ariel Sharon. Netanyahu’s attitude comes through in a video taped nine years ago and shown on Israeli TV, in which he bragged about how he deceived President Clinton into believing he (Netanyahu) was helping implement the Oslo accords when he was actually destroying them. The tape displays a contemptuous attitude toward - and wonderment at - an America so easily influenced by Israel. Netanyahu says:??”America is something that can be easily moved. Moved in the right direction. ... They won’t get in our way. ... Eighty percent of the Americans support us. It’s absurd.”

Israeli columnist Gideon Levy wrote that the video shows Netanyahu to be “a con artist ... who thinks that Washington is in his pocket and that he can pull the wool over its eyes,” adding that such behavior “does not change over the years.” As mentioned above, Netanyahu has had instructive role models. None other than Gen. Brent Scowcroft told the Financial Times that former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon had George W. Bush “mesmerized,” that “Sharon just has him “wrapped around his little finger.” (Scowcroft was promptly relieved of his duties as chair of the prestigious President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board and told never again to darken the White House doorstep.)

If further proof of American political support for Netanyahu were needed, it was manifest when Senators McCain, Lieberman, and Graham visited Israel during the second week of July. Lieberman asserted that there is wide support in Congress for using all means to keep Iran from becoming a nuclear power, including “through military actions if we must.” Graham was equally explicit: “The Congress has Israel’s back,” he said. More recently, 47 House Republicans have signed onto H.R. 1553 declaring “support for Israel’s right to use all means necessary to confront and eliminate nuclear threats posed by Iran ... including the use of military force.”

The power of the Likud Lobby, especially in an election year, facilitates Netanyahu’s attempts to convince those few of his colleagues who need convincing that there may never be a more auspicious time to bring about “regime change” in Tehran. And, as we hope your advisers have told you, regime change, not Iranian nuclear weapons, is Israel’s primary concern.

If Israel’s professed fear that one or two nuclear weapons in Iran’s arsenal would be a game changer, one would have expected Israeli leaders to jump with up and down with glee at the possibility of seeing half of Iran’s low enriched uranium shipped abroad. Instead, they dismissed as a “trick” the tripartite deal, brokered by Türkiye and Brazil with your personal encouragement, that would ship half of Iran’s low enriched uranium outside Tehran’s control.

The National Intelligence Estimate

The Israelis have been looking on intently as the U.S. intelligence community attempts to update, in a “Memorandum to Holders” of the NIE of November 2007 on Iran’s nuclear program. It is worth recalling a couple of that Estimate’s key judgments:??”We judge with high confidence that in fall of 2003 Tehran halted its nuclear weapons program. ... We assess with moderate confidence Tehran has not restarted its nuclear program as of mid-2007, but we do not know whether it currently intends to develop nuclear weapons....”

Earlier this year, public congressional testimony by former Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair (February 1 and 2) and Defense Intelligence Agency Director Gen. Ronald Burgess with Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. James Cartwright (April 14) did not alter those key judgments. Blair and others continued to underscore the intelligence community’s agnosticism on one key point: as Blair put it earlier this year, “We do not know if Iran will eventually decide to build a nuclear weapon.”

The media have reported off-the-cuff comments by Panetta and by you, with a darker appraisal - with you telling Israeli TV, “all indicators are that they [the Iranians] are in fact pursuing a nuclear weapon,” and Panetta telling ABC, “I think they continue to work on designs in that area [of weaponization].” Panetta hastened to add, though, that in Tehran, “There is a continuing debate right now as to whether or not they ought to proceed with the bomb.”

Israel probably believes it must give more weight to the official testimony of Blair, Burgess, and Cartwright, which dovetail with the earlier NIE, and the Israelis are afraid that the long-delayed Memorandum to Holders of the 2007 NIE will essentially affirm that Estimate’s key judgments. Our sources tell us that an honest Memorandum to Holders is likely to do precisely that, and that they suspect that the several-months-long delay means intelligence judgments are being “fixed” around the policy - as was the case before the attack on Iraq.

One War Prevented

The key judgments of the November 2007 NIE shoved an iron rod into the wheel spokes of the Dick Cheney-led juggernaut rolling toward war on Iran. The NIE infuriated Israel leaders eager to attack before President Bush and Cheney left office. This time, Netanyahu fears that issuance of an honest Memorandum might have a similar effect.

Bottom line: more incentive for Israel to preempt such an Estimate by striking Iran sooner rather than later.

Last week’s announcement that U.S. officials will meet next month with Iranian counterparts to resume talks on ways to arrange higher enrichment of Iranian low-enriched uranium (LEU) for Tehran’s medical research reactor was welcome news to all but the Israeli leaders. In addition, Iran reportedly has said it would be prepared to halt enrichment to 20 percent (the level needed for the medical research reactor) and has made it clear that it looks forward to the resumption of talks.

Again, an agreement that would send a large portion of Iran’s LEU abroad would, at a minimum, hinder progress toward nuclear weapons, should Iran decide to develop them. But it would also greatly weaken Israel’s scariest rationale for an attack on Iran. Bottom line: with the talks on what Israel’s leaders earlier labeled a “trick” now scheduled to resume in September, incentive builds in Tel Aviv for the Israelis to attack before any such agreement can be reached. We’ll say it again: the objective is regime change. Creating synthetic fear of Iranian nuclear weapons is simply the best way to “justify” bringing about regime change. Worked well for Iraq, no?

Another War in Need of Prevention A strong public statement by you, personally warning Israel not to attack Iran, would most probably head off such an Israeli move. Follow-up might include dispatching Adm. Mullen to Tel Aviv with military-to-military instructions to Israel: Don’t even think of it.

In the wake of the 2007 NIE, President Bush overruled Vice President Cheney and sent Adm. Mullen to Israel to impart that hard message. A much-relieved Mullen arrived home that spring sure of step and grateful that he had dodged the likelihood of being on the end of a Cheney-inspired order for him to send U.S. forces into war with Iran.

This time around, Mullen returned with sweaty palms from a visit to Israel in February 2010. Ever since, he has been worrying aloud that Israel might mousetrap the U.S. into war with Iran, while adding the obligatory assurance that the Pentagon does have an attack plan for Iran, if needed. In contrast to his experience in 2008, though, Mullen seemed troubled that Israel’s leaders did not take his warnings seriously.

While in Israel, Mullen insisted publicly that an attack on Iran would be “a big, big, big problem for all of us, and I worry a great deal about the unintended consequences.”

After his return, at a Pentagon press conference on Feb. 22 Mullen drove home the same point. After reciting the usual boilerplate about Iran being “on the path to achieve nuclear weaponization” and its “desire to dominate its neighbors,” he included the following in his prepared remarks:

“For now, the diplomatic and the economic levers of international power are and ought to be the levers first pulled. Indeed, I would hope they are always and consistently pulled. No strike, however effective, will be, in and of itself, decisive.” Unlike younger generals - David Petraeus, for example - Adm. Mullen served in the Vietnam War. That experience is probably what prompts asides like this: “I would remind everyone of an essential truth: War is bloody and uneven. It’s messy and ugly and incredibly wasteful....” Although the immediate context for that remark was Afghanistan, Mullen has underscored time and again that war with Iran would be a far larger disaster. Those with a modicum of familiarity with the military, strategic, and economic equities at stake know he is right.

Other Steps

In 2008, after Mullen read the Israelis the riot act, they put their preemptive plans for Iran aside. With that mission accomplished, Mullen gave serious thought to ways to prevent any unintended (or, for that matter, deliberately provoked) incidents in the crowded Persian Gulf that could lead to wider hostilities.

Mullen sent up an interesting trial balloon at a July 2, 2008, press conference, when he indicated that military-to-military dialogue could “add to a better understanding” between the U.S. and Iran. But nothing more was heard of this overture, probably because Cheney ordered him to drop it.

It was a good idea - still is. The danger of a U.S.-Iranian confrontation in the crowded Persian Gulf has not been addressed, and should be. Establishment of a direct communications link between top military officials in Washington and Tehran would reduce the danger of an accident, miscalculation, or covert, false-flag attack.

In our view, that should be done immediately - particularly since recently introduced sanctions assert a right to inspect Iranian ships. The naval commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards reportedly has threatened “a response in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz” if anyone tries to inspect Iranian ships in international waters.

Another safety valve would result from successful negotiation of the kind of bilateral “incidents-at-sea” protocol that was concluded with the Russians in 1972 during a period of relatively high tension.

With only interim nobodies at the helm of the intelligence community, you may wish to consider knocking some heads together yourself and insisting that it finish an honest Memorandum to Holders of the 2007 NIE by mid-August - recording any dissents, as necessary. Sadly, our former colleagues tell us that politicization of intelligence analysis did not end with the departure of Bush and Cheney... and that the problem is acute even at the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research, which in the past has done some of the best professional, objective, tell-it-like-it-is analysis.

Pundits, Think-Tanks: Missing the Point

As you may have noticed, most of page one of Sunday’s Washington Post Outlook section was given to an article titled, “A Nuclear Iran: Would America Strike to Prevent It? - Imagining Obama’s Response to an Iranian Missile Crisis.” Page five was dominated by the rest of the article, under the title “Who will blink first when Iran is on the brink?” A page-wide photo of a missile rolling past Iranian dignitaries on a reviewing stand (reminiscent of the familiar parades on Red Square) is aimed at the centerfold of the Outlook section, as if poised to blow it to smithereens.??Typically, the authors address the Iranian “threat” as though it endangers the U.S., even though Secretary Clinton has stated publicly that this is not the case. They write that one option for the U.S. is “the lonely, unpopular path of taking military action lacking allied consensus.” O Tempora, O Mores! In less than a decade, wars of aggression have become nothing more than lonely, unpopular paths.

What is perhaps most remarkable, though, is that the word Israel is nowhere to be found in this very long article. Similar think pieces, including some from relatively progressive think-tanks, also address these issues as though they were simply bilateral U.S.-Iranian problems, with little or no attention to Israel.

Guns of August?

The stakes could hardly be higher. Letting slip the dogs of war would have immense repercussions. Again, we hope that Adm. Mullen and others have given you comprehensive briefings on them. Netanyahu would be taking a fateful gamble by attacking Iran, with high risk to everyone involved. The worst, but conceivable case, has Netanyahu playing - unintentionally - Dr. Kevorkian to the state of Israel.

Even if the U.S. were to be sucked into a war provoked by Israel, there is absolutely no guarantee that the war would come out well. Were the U.S. to suffer significant casualties, and were Americans to become aware that such losses came about because of exaggerated Israeli claims of a nuclear threat from Iran, Israel could lose much of its high standing in the United States. There could even be a surge in anti-Semitism, as Americans conclude that officials with dual loyalties in Congress and the executive branch threw our troops into a war provoked, on false pretenses, by Likudniks for their own narrow purposes. We do not have a sense that major players in Tel Aviv or in Washington are sufficiently sensitive to these critical factors.

You are in position to prevent this unfortunate but likely chain reaction. We allow for the possibility that Israeli military action might not lead to a major regional war, but we consider the chances of that much less than even.

Footnote: VIPS Experience

We VIPS have found ourselves in this position before. We prepared our first Memorandum for the President on the afternoon of Feb. 5, 2003, after Colin Powell’s speech at the UN. We had been watching how our profession was being corrupted into serving up faux intelligence that was later criticized (correctly) as “uncorroborated, contradicted, and nonexistent” - adjectives used by former Senate Intelligence Committee chair Jay Rockefeller after a five-year investigation by his committee. As Powell spoke, we decided collectively that the responsible thing to do was to try to warn the president before he acted on misguided advice to attack Iraq. Unlike Powell, we did not claim that our analysis was “irrefutable and undeniable.” We did conclude with this warning [.pdf]:

“After watching Secretary Powell today, we are convinced that you would be well served if you widened the discussion ... beyond the circle of those advisers clearly bent on a war for which we see no compelling reason and from which we believe the unintended consequences are likely to be catastrophic.” We take no satisfaction at having gotten it right on Iraq. Others with claim to more immediate expertise on Iraq were issuing similar warnings. But we were kept well away from the wagons circled by Bush and Cheney. Sadly, your own vice president, who was then chair of the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee, was among the most assiduous in blocking opportunities for dissenting voices to be heard. This is part of what brought on the worst foreign policy disaster in our nation’s history.

We now believe that we may also be right on (and right on the cusp of) another impending catastrophe of even wider scope - Iran - on which another president, you, are not getting good advice from your closed circle of advisers.

They are probably telling you that, since you have privately counseled Prime Minister Netanyahu against attacking Iran, he will not do it. This could simply be the familiar syndrome of telling the president what they believe he wants to hear. Quiz them; tell them others believe them to be dead wrong on Netanyahu. The only positive here is that you - only you - can prevent an Israeli attack on Iran.

Steering Group, Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) Phil Giraldi, directorate of operations, CIA (20 years) Larry Johnson, directorate of intelligence, CIA; Department of State, Department of Defense consultant (24 years) W. Patrick Lang, colonel, USA, Special Forces (ret.); Senior Executive Service: defense intelligence officer for Middle East/South Asia; director of HUMINT Collection, Defense Intelligence Agency (30 years) Ray McGovern, U.S. Army intelligence officer; directorate of intelligence, CIA (30 years) Coleen Rowley, special agent and Minneapolis division counsel, FBI (24 years) Ann Wright, colonel, U.S. Army Reserve (ret.), (29 years); Foreign Service officer, Department of State (16 years)

###

The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, PO Box 21041, Washington DC 20009. Phone: (202) 939-6050, Fax: (202) 265-4574, Toll Free: (800) 368-5788, www.wrmea.com Published by the American Educational Trust, a non-profit foundation incorporated in Washington, DC to provide the American public with balanced and accurate information concerning U.S. relations with Middle Eastern states. Material from the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs may be printed with out charge with attribution to the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.

From <https://www.wrmea.org/action-alert-archives/israel-may-drag-u.s.-into-another-war.html>

DANCING ISRAELIS | Declassified FBI Report

Overview and Press Clippings

Dancing Israelis | Overview &Press Clippings

Scroll or Pop-out

USA 911 SEPTEMBER 11 - FAILURE TO ATTEND WARNINGS DANCING ISRAELIS

Scroll or Pop-out

Dancing Israelis (141 Declassified Pages - Link)

FBI Declassified File Excerpt (8pg)

Scroll or Pop-out

Pages from Declassified fbi 911 report section 1_text MAR MARKUP.pdf

Scroll or Pop-out

full text of fbi report | 141 pages

Dancing Israelis (141 Declassified Pages)

FBI Declassified File (all 141 pages)

Scroll or Pop-out

Declassified fbi 911 report section 1_text MAR MARKUP.pdf

Scroll or Pop-out

Withheld from 9/11 Commission | Saudi Support for Hijackers in LA! and SD!

Right where Israel has large West Coast Spy Operations!

Biden Declassifies Secret FBI Report Detailing Saudi Nationals' Connections To 9/11

911 Saudi Report

Declassifed - FBI OPERATION ENCORE report--9.11 meetups with Saudis in Culver City LA under the nose of Israeli surveillance monitoring the controversial King Fahad Mosque (see wiki) entirely financed by the Saudi Kingdom and adjacent shuttered school after the Kingdom withdrew financial support recently.

Biden Declassifies Secret FBI Report Detailing Saudi Nationals' Connections To 9/11

September 12, 2021 | Heard on Weekend Edition Sunday | Laura Sullivan

The partially redacted FBI report paints a closer relationship than had been previously known between two Saudis in particular — including one with diplomatic status — and some of the hijackers. Diane Bondareff/AP

The Biden administration has declassified a 16-page FBI report tying 9/11 hijackers to Saudi nationals living in the United States. The document, written in 2016, summarized an FBI investigation into those ties called Operation ENCORE.

Withheld from 9/11 Commission | Saudi Support for Hijackers in LA! and SD!

Right where Israel has large West Coast Spy Operations!

RELEASED UNDER BIDEN - 9/11 REPORT SHOWING SAUDI BACKING

Scroll or Pop-Out (19 pages)

Declassified CIA fbi 9-11 FBI OPeration Enccore 20page released 2022.pdf

RELEASED UNDER BIDEN - 9/11 REPORT SHOWING SAUDI BACKING

Scroll or Pop-Out (19 pages)

The partially redacted report shows a closer relationship than had been previously known between two Saudis in particular — including one with diplomatic status — and some of the hijackers. Families of the 9/11 victims have long sought after the report, which painted a starkly different portrait than the one described by the 9/11 Commission Report in 2004.

While the commission was largely unable to tie the Saudi men to the hijackers, the FBI document describes multiple connections and phone calls.

Years ago, the commission wrote that when it came to the Saudi diplomat Fahad al-Thumairy, "We have not found evidence that Thumairy provided assistance to the two hijackers."

10-years later--FBI CHANGES CONCLUSION..

A decade later, it appears FBI agents came to a different conclusion. The report says Thumairy "tasked" an associate to help the hijackers when they arrived in Los Angeles and told the associate the hijackers were "two very significant people" more than a year before the attacks.

The report also casts new light on the meeting of a Saudi government employee with the hijackers in a restaurant. What was once portrayed as a chance meeting is now painted as a preplanned, well-orchestrated event. The 2004 9/11 Commission had described the Saudi employee, Omar al-Bayoumi, as "gregarious." Investigators wrote that they found him "to be an unlikely candidate for clandestine involvement with Islamic extremists."

The ENCORE report, however, says a witness to the meeting saw Bayoumi waiting by the window for the hijackers to arrive rather than running into them by chance and engaged in a lengthy conversation with them. The report says a woman told investigators Bayoumi was often saying that the Islamic community "needs to take action" and that the community was "at jihad."

In an interview, victims' families said they found other items in the report revealing. For example, both Thumairy and Bayoumi were each just a degree or two of separation away from others on a phone tree of known international terrorists. Bayoumi was in "almost daily contact" with a man with ties to the mastermind of the 1993 World Trade Center attack and spent the night in a hotel with another man connected to one of Osama bin Laden's senior lieutenants.

Thumairy's phone, meanwhile, was linked to people associated with the "Millennium Plot Bomber," who was convicted in a plot to bomb Los Angeles International Airport on New Year's Eve 1999.

Bayoumi and Thumairy told 9/11 investigators they had nothing to do with the attacks.

While the report does not draw any direct links between hijackers and the Saudi Arabian government as a whole, Jim Kreindler, who represents many of the families suing Saudi Arabia, said the report validates the arguments they have made in the case.

"This document, together with the public evidence gathered to date, provides a blueprint for how al-Qaida operated inside the U.S.," he said, "with the active, knowing support of the Saudi government."

The Saudi government has long maintained that any connections between Saudi nationals and the hijackers were coincidental and have pointed to years of fighting al-Qaida in partnership with the United States.

"No evidence has ever emerged to indicate that the Saudi government or its officials had previous knowledge of the terrorist attack or were in any way involved in its planning or execution," officials said in a statement released by the Saudi Embassy. "Any allegation that Saudi Arabia is complicit in the September 11 attacks is categorically false."

Family members of those who have died said regardless, they have waited years for information to be released. The ENCORE document is the first of many documents that the Biden administration has promised to release in coming months. source npr:

2005 OIG REPORT ON FBI HANDLING OF HIJACKERS

XXXX

google doc | OIG Report on FBI Handling of Intel RE 9/11

Scroll or Pop-Out (19 pages)

USA SEPTEMBER 11 OIG REPORT FBI CIA

Google doc

Scroll or Pop-Out (19 pages)

A Review of the FBI's Handling of Intelligence Information Prior to the September 11 Attacks

Special Report

November 2004 (Released Publicly June 2005)

Office of the Inspector General

I. Introduction

On September 11, 2001, 19 terrorists hijacked 4 commercial airplanes as part of a coordinated terrorist attack against the United States. Two of the planes crashed into the World Trade Center Towers in New York City and one hit the Pentagon near Washington, D.C. The fourth plane crashed in a field in southwestern Pennsylvania. More than 3,000 persons were killed in these terrorist attacks.

On February 14, 2002, the House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence began a joint inquiry to address questions related to the September 11 attacks, such as “what the Intelligence Community knew prior to September 11 about the scope and nature of any possible terrorist attacks… what was done with that information” and “how and to what degree the elements of the Intelligence Community have interacted with each other, as well as with other parts of the federal, state, and local governments, with respect to identifying, tracking, assessing, and coping with international terrorist threats.”1 This review became known as the Joint Intelligence Committee Inquiry or “the JICI review.”

One of the key questions arising after the attacks was what information the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) knew before September 11 that was potentially related to the terrorist attacks. On May 21, 2002, Coleen Rowley, the Chief Division Counsel in the FBI’s Minneapolis Field Office,2 wrote a 13-page letter to FBI Director Robert Mueller in which she raised concerns about how the FBI had handled certain information in its possession before the attacks. [INFORMATION REDACTED]

[INFORMATION REDACTED]

[INFORMATION REDACTED] In addition, the Director asked the OIG to review the issues in an Electronic Communication (EC) written by an FBI Special Agent in Phoenix (known as the Phoenix EC), as well as “any other matters relating to the FBI’s handling of information and/or intelligence before September 11, 2001 that might relate in some manner to the September 11, 2001 attacks.”

The OIG agreed to conduct a review in response to the FBI Director’s request. In conducting our review, OIG investigators also learned that prior to the September 11 attacks the Intelligence Community had acquired a significant amount of intelligence about two of the hijackers – Nawaf al Hazmi and Khalid al Mihdhar.4 Well before September 11, 2001, the Intelligence Community had discovered that Hazmi and Mihdhar had met with other al Qaeda operatives in Malaysia in January 2000. The CIA also had discovered that Mihdhar possessed a valid U.S visa and that Hazmi had traveled to the United States in January 2000. The FBI contended, however, that it was not informed of Mihdhar’s U.S. visa and Hazmi’s travel to the United States until August 2001, just before the September 11 attacks. At that time, the FBI had initiated an investigation to locate Mihdhar and Hazmi, but the FBI was not close to finding them at the time of the September 11 attacks. The OIG also learned that Hazmi and Mihdhar had resided in the San Diego area in 2000, where they interacted with a former subject of an FBI investigation and lived as boarders in the home of an FBI source. The OIG therefore decided to include in its review an investigation of the intelligence information available to the FBI about Hazmi and Mihdhar before September 11 and the FBI’s handling of that intelligence information.

In December 2002, the JICI released its final report entitled, “Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities before and after the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001.” One of the report’s recommendations was for the Inspectors General at the Department of Justice (DOJ), CIA, Department of Defense, and Department of State to determine whether and to what extent personnel at those agencies should be held accountable for any acts or omissions with regard to the identification, prevention, and disruption of the September 11 terrorist attacks.

II. OIG investigation

The OIG’s review focused on the FBI’s handling of the Phoenix EC, [INFORMATION REDACTED] and the intelligence information about Mihdhar and Hazmi. To review these issues, the OIG assembled a team of four attorneys, three special agents, and two auditors. The team conducted 225 interviews of personnel from the DOJ, FBI, CIA, and other agencies. For example, we interviewed FBI personnel from FBI Headquarters; from FBI field offices in Minneapolis, San Diego, New York, Phoenix, and Oklahoma; and from FBI offices overseas. We also interviewed employees from the CIA, the INS, the National Security Agency (NSA), and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). We reviewed over 14,000 pages of documents we obtained from the FBI, the CIA, the NSA, and JICI.

Our review of the FBI’s handling of the Hazmi and Mihdhar matter required us to obtain a significant amount of information from the CIA regarding its interactions with the FBI on that matter. To conduct our review, we thus had to rely on the cooperation of the CIA in providing us access to CIA witnesses and documents. We were able to obtain CIA documents and interviewed CIA witnesses, but we did not have the same access to the CIA that we had to DOJ information and employees. We also note that the CIA OIG is conducting its own inquiry of the CIA’s actions with regard to the Mihdhar and Hazmi matter.

III. Organization of the OIG report

This report is organized into six chapters. Chapter One contains this introduction. Chapter Two provides general background on the issues discussed in this report. For example, it contains descriptions of key terminology, the FBI’s organizational structure, the so-called “wall” that separated intelligence and criminal investigations in the FBI and the DOJ, the process for obtaining a FISA warrant, and other legal background issues related to how the FBI investigated terrorism and intelligence cases before September 11, 2001. Because the background chapter contains basic terminology and concepts, those with more extensive knowledge of these issues may not need to read this chapter in full.

Chapter Three evaluates the FBI’s handling of the Phoenix EC. As an initial matter, we provide background on how “leads” were assigned in the FBI before September 11, 2001, and we summarize the contents of the Phoenix EC. We then describe in detail how the Phoenix EC was handled within the FBI before September 11. In the analysis section of Chapter Three, we examine problems in how the Phoenix EC was handled, first focusing on the systemic problems that affected the way the FBI treated the EC and then discussing the performance of the individuals involved with the EC. At the end of the chapter we discuss several other pieces of information in the possession of the FBI before September 11 that also noted connections of potential terrorists to the aviation industry or the use of airplanes.

[INFORMATION REDACTED]

In Chapter Five, we examine the FBI’s handling of intelligence information concerning Hazmi and Mihdhar. We found that, beginning in late 1999 and continuing through September 11, 2001, the FBI had at least five opportunities to learn of intelligence information about Mihdhar and Hazmi which could have led it to focus on them before the September 11 attacks. In this chapter, we describe each of these five opportunities in detail. We describe the intelligence information regarding Hazmi and Mihdhar that existed at the time, whether the information was made available to the FBI, and what additional information about Hazmi and Mihdhar the FBI could have developed on its own. In the analysis section of this chapter, we evaluate the problems that impeded the FBI’s handling of the information about Hazmi and Mihdhar before September 11, and we also address the performance of the individuals involved in the Hazmi and Mihdhar case.

In Chapter Six, we set forth our recommendations for systemic improvements in the FBI and we summarize our conclusions.

[INFORMATION REDACTED] At that time, the OIG provided the report, which was classified at the TOP SECRET/SCI level, to the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (9/11 Commission). The 9/11 Commission used certain information from our report in its final report. In July 2004, we also provided our classified report to certain congressional committees with oversight of the Department of Justice, including the House of Representatives and Senate Committees on the Judiciary, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

At the request of the Senate Judiciary Committee, the OIG has created this 370-page unclassified version of the report. To do so, we worked with the FBI, the CIA, and the NSA to delete classified information from our full report. However, the substance of the report has not changed, and we believe that this unclassified version fairly summarizes the findings of the full report.

source OIG

videos - Alan promotes War Crimes and Discredity Carl Schmitt 'legitimacy' v. legality

means justify the ends - legitimacy v. legality (see caption on INSS video)

Legality & Legitimacy| Alan Dershowitz |11 Dec 2013

Video 8 minutes | INSS

Glenn Greenwald and Alan Dershowitz Debate Bombing Iran

Video 2 hour | May 24, 2024 Soho Forum Debates Reason

Alan Dershowitz house calls to Jeff Epstein mansion: Attorney Alan Dershowitz defended Epstein in the 2008 criminal case. In one of the documents, lawyers discuss sworn testimony by two household employees, one of whom said Dershowitz visited Epstein's Florida mansion "pretty often" and allegedly got massages while he was there. According to the court document, the other employee testified Dershowitz visited Epstein's home without his family when young girls were present. Dershowitz has previously denied wrongdoing. Ahead of the documents' release, Dershowitz warned against inferring anything about their contents in a livestream on his personal YouTube channel Tuesday, saying "the important thing is not to assume guilt by association or guilt by accusation." He said in the half-hour livestream that, as Epstein's lawyer, he had been on the plane many times and he had been to the island once, with his wife and daughter, when no young people were present.

cbsnews.com