MY Apartheid Deadbeat Dad Officer - Scott Del Crognale
SMPD "DeadBeat Dad" regular beat cop Scott Del Crognale Called me a Liar, Criminalized me, Made me Regret calling 911. Then Sgt Zendejas and Sgt Williams said they would investigate, share their findings in a week, but TWO (2) weeks later NO REPLY after multiple inquiries.
"Deadbeat Daddy" Cop Del Crognale Claims Perpetrator may be victim, and I'm the criminal aggressor--
Why is the White Male perpetrator believed, and I am Not???
Deadbeat Case #23FL100969
I was Detained for 35 hours for having created and shared this webpage with police department via mass email on Friday night, Jan 19, 2024. My OUTRAGE is the result of being denied basic public safety services DESPITE clear and irrefutable evidence about having suffered BODILY HARM (3X), Wrongful Imprisonment (1x), and PROPERTY vandalism and theft (5X-10X). But PRIOR CALLS FOR ASSISTANCE DO NOT MATTER SAYS Sgt. Lozano and Officer Del Crognale and Officer Walter Ramirez. BULLSHIT boys...You know NOTHING with the three of you having 60+ years of bullshit incompetent service--
You are CHILD WELFARE RECIPIENTS from the taxpayers of Santa Monica.
Please see this profile of my credentials as the greatest terrorist to step foot on American soil who is more deadly than Osama bin Laden and his entire organization.
Authorities claim I am capable of Impossible Mission Impossible
SEE LINK to my pictorial court filing. (Anti-Slapp protected) - posted Jan 20, 2024 before I was detained by SMPD for 35 hours.
Tells me to get a Civil Restraining Order (as if that will enforce the Penal Code)
Courtesy of Santa Monica Police Department
CC: Anti-Defamation League, Santa Monica-City Council, City Attorney, Sunrise Realty
Dear Chief Ramon Batista,
Please Note the Property Damage Photos and Statement of Facts regarding this LATEST incident of wanton destruction of my living space by my roommate Antoine De Lartigue. Despite more than seven incident reports filed by me since mid-December about my aggressor's escalating harassment and violence, you continue showing absolute contempt for your professional duties and my personal safety.
Since apparently law-abiding citizens cannot get assistance from Santa Monica PD, you Chief Barista are Pro-Criminal; Pro-Property Crimes; Pro-Violence. It seems like your shop is on an undeclared union work slowdown for the purposes of undermining public confidence in law enforcement--and the criminal justice system. Seems like the squeaky wheel advocating for law and order is the wheel getting BUSTED by the top BRASS in your Department--You rather have me SLAMMED into the BACK of a SQUAD Car than do your goddamn job...Truly Pathetic--Your Resort to Violence like a Street Thug by having me SHOVED by my HEAD into a SQUAD car at my corner Bagel Nosh on 17th. I ask for double-cuffs because of my back injury--I'm to PIss Off because your cuffs are approved no matter what the circumstance.
Goons showing the kind of attitude presented by your police do indeed get guys like George Floyd killed because you Chauvin-types have so much at stake showing your superiority over those who you are chartered to protect but who in fact you deem to be your civilian subordinates while you imagine your ridiculous uniform, goofy shoes, and trinket badge make some kind of Mussolini! You'll do it Floyd--but I am surprised you can do that to a Jew on the Westside. But of course, you and some in your Department have a problem with Jews, don't you Chief Batista?
You chose to detain me for nearly 40 hours because I had the audacity to complain about your total dereliction of duty to your public safety mission as the senior-most peace officer in the City of Santa Monica. You care more about your pride being injured by my tirade against your dismissive attitude towards my demand for equal protection under the law. That's offensive to Chief Batista? For you---Getting shamed by my email in front of your colleagues and City Council led you to ABUSE your authority by having me detained for no legitimate reason whatsoever. That is by definition arbitrary and capricious abuse of state power--By definition your conduct is textbook tyranny.
Based on my experience with your Department-and your lack of leadership--I can't wait for CHATGPT to replace you! Unlike one of your two responding officers today--who I will call "Tall Boy," the ChatGPT has a more appropriate customer-facing peace-officer demeanor!
Chat GPT is empathetic, expressing concern for my unpleasant experience unlike your "Tall Boy" who spoke to me like was a suspect rather than a victim just like SMPD's Deadbeat Dad, Officer Scott "Moustache" Del Crognale did when he insinuated that I was in fact guilty of the assault and property theft that I had called 911 for assistance.
Do you blame the DA for failure to prosecute misdemeanor property and other penal code violations when the so-called DA (who I don't like) is prosecuting at the same rate as his predecessor Ms. Jackie Lacey who was beloved by the Nazi union representatives of the LA County Association of Deputy District Attorneys?
Is the problem of petty crime is NOT a failure to prosecute by the DA but in FACT a failure by Police to press charges--and Blame the DA as a scapegoat?
Are the Police on an undeclared union work slow-down or strike?
Is the problem of nuisance property crimes and other annoying and sometimes still scary misdemeanors a function of inadequate force deployment? Do we have a problem in police (lack of) patrolling?
Why for the handling of the routine (~25 percent of your incidents) addressing the problem of un-housed or addicted people in distress on our affluent street DOES it take up to six squad cars each of which is filled with multiple $190k Avg Annual Pay cops? Is this efficient use of resources? No presence whatsoever on the Wilshire corridor--then out of nowhere a brigade of SMPD ready to bombard Gaza!
Is it possible to address people in distress on our streets--a common situation--in a less violent and expensive manner? For example could we handle these human situations with two poorly paid private security guards who do NOT have Lethal Weapons and do NOT deploy excessive force? Or how about some social workers patrolling our commercial corridors for the purpose of helping and supporting and building trust?
I don't often declare my Jewish identity but it appears that such a declaration might be necessary to receive any assistance from your police department. Regarding your record Incident #2024-23181 that I filed around noon this morning, I am shocked and appalled about your Police Department's callous disregard for my safety, personal well-being, entitlement on an equal basis to public services such as assistance from your Department and equal treatment under the rule of law. Clearly I am having another hellish "Straight Out of Santa Monica '' experience as shown on your unofficial webpage created by concerned citizens against cop corruption and competency problems.
Anti-Semitism. Apparently since I present as a Jew by most accounts of both gentiles and Jews on the Westside, and I am genetically Jewish and culturally Jewish by divine disposition, there is apparently de facto discrimination against my Jewish identity in favor of my gentile, white male aggressor, Antoine De Lartigue.
Specifically, I sought assistance from your Department this morning because I had been subjected to harassment and threatening conduct by a serial violator and harasser--namely Antoine De Lartigue who is my roommate and co-star in Equalizer 2 (2018). Mr. De Lartigue apparently believes his fictional role in a "Deal with the Devil" is his real-life role as the Devil incarnate. This Morning, Mr. De Lartigue violently banged on my bedroom door this morning around 10.15AM, which not only startled me but made me fearful for my personal safety because of his previous physical assaults against me and destruction of my personal property. As you can see in the attached photo, the force he applied against my door was SO GREAT that he literally destroyed the door frame--Split the wood--broke the hinge off the frame. He also destroyed a lamp in the living room. Given the half-dozen incident reports I have filed over the past few months.
Antoine has a repeated and escalating pattern of dangerous, threatening, destructive behavior--battery & assault (physically shoving me to the ground); imprisonment (locking me in my bedroom-unable to get out without police assistance), willful destruction or removal of my property, verbal threats, tenant harassment (verbal threats of physical harm, verbal discrimination against my disabilities, false statements for purposes of evicting me), attempted larceny (lies to get me to pay him money I did not owe him)
But is there no violation of the penal code according to your officers? And when I asked them to contact aggressor Antoine, one of the two officers who had come into my apartment at my request in fact dismissively said he would contact Antoine if he was present in the apartment, even though he had been told repeatedly that I was home alone. I asked if they would contact Antoine again, and the officer dismissively indicated he would without asking for Antoine's phone number, and without showing any interest in the damage inflicted to my door, and without taking a photo as evidence. This officer--the taller of the two--is pathetic in his customer-facing demeanor...Pathetic. At least the shorter of the two officers visually checked the door. The tall boy did not--and then spoke in a disrespectful 'commanding tone,' stating that 'I need to return to the living room to finish this,' as if I AM A CRIMINAL OR SUSPECT.
SMPD on strike-refusing to enforce penal code. According to them, there is no violation of penal code in the present circumstance, and according to your Sergeants, none in the past. I disagree. They insist a civil restraining order is my only option.
I offer you the following legal thoughts from ChatGPT about possible options that you officers COULD have used in the past, and could do so in the present circumstances.
Is your Department no longer in the business of enforcing the penal code? See below. If you are a "reform" minded officer, the old school cops must be NAZIs--Gestapo thugs--like your predessors in Mesa AZ and the cop union leader in Mesa who helped push you out of your job because you opposed shooting civilians in the back. This situation is entirely Anti-Semitic. Regards-Bryan Gobin
See ChatGPT advice and photo below.
==========================================================
BCG: i have a penal code california question. I know you're not a lawyer. I would like to give you a scenario and have you evaluate possible penal or civil violations.
CHATGPT: Of course, I can do my best to help you understand potential legal implications based on the scenario you provide. Please go ahead and describe the scenario, and I'll do my best to evaluate any possible penal or civil violations.
BCG: here is the situation. My roommate who has harassed and physically assaulted me on multiple occasions in the past engaged in more bad conduct. Specifically, he banged on my bedroom door with such great force that he broke the wooden door frame and caused the hinge to be broken. I was very fearful for my personal safety and scared. I yelled at him that I would call 911, and in fact did file a report. I did NOT leave my bedroom until he had left the apartment for fear of my personal safety. Please offer some possible penal or civil code violations in the state of california, county of los angeles.
CHATGPT: I'm sorry to hear about your situation. Based on the scenario you've described, there are several potential legal violations that may apply under California law:
Assault and Battery: Your roommate's past behavior of harassment and physical assault could constitute assault and battery offenses. Assault involves the threat of violence, while battery involves the actual physical contact. Both offenses can result in criminal charges and civil liability.
Vandalism: The act of banging on your bedroom door with such force that it broke the wooden door frame and caused damage to the hinge could potentially be considered vandalism under California Penal Code Section 594. Vandalism involves the intentional destruction or damage of property belonging to another person.
Criminal Threats: If your roommate made threats against you during this incident, such as threatening to harm you or your property, it could constitute a criminal threat under California Penal Code Section 422. A criminal threat is a serious offense that involves the intent to instill fear or apprehension in another person.
Domestic Violence: If you and your roommate have a domestic relationship, such as being current or former romantic partners, the incidents of harassment, assault, and threats could also fall under California's domestic violence laws, which include various penal code sections and protective measures.
Civil Remedies: In addition to potential criminal charges, you may also have grounds to pursue civil remedies such as a restraining order, civil harassment restraining order, or a lawsuit for damages (such as property damage or emotional distress) against your roommate.
It's important to document any evidence of the incidents, such as photographs of the damage to your door, any injuries you sustained, and any witnesses who can corroborate your account. You may also want to consider seeking assistance from local law enforcement, victim advocacy organizations, or legal aid services for guidance on how to address the situation and protect your safety.
BCG: Please offer more information about "assault and batter."
CHATGPT: Certainly. Assault and battery are distinct but related offenses under California law.
Assault: In California, assault is defined under Penal Code Section 240 as an unlawful attempt, coupled with the present ability, to commit a violent injury on the person of another. This means that someone commits assault if they make a threat or attempt to harm another person and have the present ability to carry out that threat. Assault does not require physical contact to occur; the mere threat of violence is sufficient to constitute assault.
Battery: Battery, on the other hand, is the actual physical act of unlawful touching or striking of another person against their will. In California, battery is defined under Penal Code Section 242. Unlike assault, battery requires physical contact and does not require the intent to cause harm—only the intent to make physical contact without consent.
In your scenario, if your roommate has physically assaulted you in the past, those incidents may constitute instances of battery. Additionally, if your roommate's banging on your door with such force that it caused damage made you fear for your safety, it could constitute assault if your roommate had the present ability to harm you, even if no physical contact occurred.
Both assault and battery are considered criminal offenses under California law and can result in misdemeanor or felony charges, depending on the severity of the conduct and other factors. Victims of assault and battery may also pursue civil remedies, such as seeking damages for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other losses resulting from the incident.
From: bryan gobin <bryan.gobin.unc@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 11:45 AM
Subject: Broken door do to your banging this am
To: Antoine De Lartigue <antoinedelartigue@gmail.com>
Antoine
Upon returning to the Apartment after stepping out for some peace after you had left this morning, I noticed that My bedroom door Is no longer functioning because the wood frame is damaged and the hinges are no longer holding to the door frame because the wood is split as a result of your violent banging on the door this morning.
I am not sure if you’re aware just frightful your conduct, but the door frame is testimony to the level of physical trauma you inflicted upon the door, and a tantamount level of Fear, for my personal safety was inflicted upon me by your banging this morning. See attached photo for your records.
I have contacted the police to file an incident report on this matter since there is clear physical damages. I also know you broke the light in the living room as well. How are you?
Bryan Gobin
Connect with me on LinkedIn
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.
--
Bryan Gobin
Connect with me on LinkedIn
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.
--------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Value Veracity <valueveracity@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 2:57 PM
To: <Mashhoud.Boroujerdi@santamonica.gov>, ramon Batista <ramon.batista@santamonica.gov>, <Walter.Ramirez@santamonica.gov>, <Scott.Delcrognale@santamonica.gov>
RE: No service and unlawful detainment in retaliation for complaining about "No service"
CC: Press (on BCC), City Council, SMPD supervising officers
Dear Chief Batista:
I shared my experience with your Department with a targeted audience of school district staffers who will absolutely be appalled by the lack of service that I received from your department.
You may wish to review the current webpage--which has been polished a bit. Feel free to offer feedback, but do NOT ever retaliate against me again---and what your department did do by holding me 5150 without cause is a CIVIL lawsuit. If officer Walter Ramirez is so damn foolish as to not only NOT know probable cause, but also NOT know the meaning of the common sense, you can share this video playlist of B-52 Jet Bombers to Walter. Clearly, when he got offended by my statements about prior absurd allegations, he must have lost his goddamn mind by accusing me of "Impossible Mission Impossible."
For Walter Ramirez- Playlist for USAF B-52 Strategic jet Bombers
In poker I have made a "Call" against your escalation. Raise the stakes again, and I will hit you with a Trump counterpunch ten times worse than what you have just received as a mere "call." I still expect to have the incident reports filed with your department addressed for the sake of my personal safety and my personal property. The Penal Code is your job--in case there are those who forget this point.
Warm regards,
Bryan Gobin
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.
From: Value Veracity <valueveracity@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 12:46 PM
To: Aram James <abjpd1@gmail.com>, Pacific GrovePD <pacificgrovepd@gmail.com>, Value Veracity <valueveracity@gmail.com>, Wing, David A. <DAWing@lasd.org>, Y Antoine De Lartigue <antoinedelartigue@gmail.com>, <alphonso.lozano@santamonica.gov>, <bryan.gobin@uncbusiness.net>, <elizabeth.Glater@pomona.edu>, <ggascon@da.lacounty.gov>, ramon Batista <ramon.batista@santamonica.gov>
Cc: PRESS, FBI, DA
Santa Monica, Police Department
Sergeant Alphonso lozano
Cc: FBI, New York Times and Columbia law school, Antoine De Lartigue
Sgt Lozano
Let me state the obvious double standard, that you are allowed to kill a human being if you are fearful for your life, but you have indicated that if I Would be the defendant, if I Have the audacity to protect myself and my property from Antoine De Lartigue, who has repeatedly attacked my property and attacked my body.
I have never put hands on this individual, nor did I intend to up to this point where I realize that I can no longer rely on Santa Monica Police Department to provide me with basic public service and protection.
So, as I have told you, I am changing my policy as of now. If this individual Antoine touches my body, then I will defend myself. If this individual Antoine De Lartigue attempts to remove my property, I will intervene to stop him from removing my property since it is clear that the Santa Monica, Police Department has no regard for my personal property or my personal protection, Safety and well-being, and enforcement of the California penal code.
Well, if protecting my right to exist is a crime in the United States of America, then consider me guilty ass charged!!!!
It is not my intention to cause harm to anyone, but if harm is the outcome of protecting my body from assault or my property from theft, then I will do that, regardless of your desire to prosecute me for the outcome. If the outcome of a 5 foot seven person who’s got physical disability is the harm to a 6 foot two Who is more than 10 years younger than me, then, so be it.
Per our discussion. Today I have followed up with Sergeant Goodwin, regarding the investigation of the assault that I experienced. You have told me that I was assaulted on the street and identified the perpetrator. Then there would be an arrest of the perpetrator. However, I was assaulted in my own personal dwelling, and there was no arrest whatsoever and refusal to do any investigation up to this point which I expect will change.
I made clear to you that I will no longer tolerate being assaulted or having my property taken in front of me by Antoine De Lartigue, who is a white man that apparently has privileges, not according to me.
So let me be perfectly clear. If he touches me, I will defend myself. I will respond proportionally to the best of my ability, but I will neutralize him if he attempts to physically Assault me again, or attempt to take any of my property.
Now, if he ends up, getting pushed out of the sliding glass door and over the very low rail of the balcony, let me advance it is not my intention Him to cause physical harm or injury, or death to Antoine De Lartigue but if such consequences are the result of my necessary self-defense of my physical property, then I will absolutely do what I can to neutralize this individual.
You have said that if Antoine is killed, then you think it is murder regardless of my self-defense after being repeatedly assaulted over an extended period of time with no action taken by your police department. You dismissed the notion that there is Right to self-defense unless one is a white man which is implied.
Why is it that someone who assaults me on the street will supposedly get arrested But if someone assault me in my own apartment, who happens to be a white male, then no actions are taken?
There seems to be a double standard.
I have no firearms or any other weapons to defend myself. I have no baseball Billy Club to defend myself.
But if you are fearful for your life officer, you have the right to take a man’s life away. You don’t need to say anything other than you are fearful for your life to fire your weapon with the intent to kill another human being. If I use my body to defend myself, and the result is the other person loses in a fight, then I can somehow be responsible for that person, losing a fight or losing his life because he was attempting to cause me physical harm or he attempted to stop me from preventing him from seizing my own property.
That is a remarkable double standard. But I’m willing to defend myself and my property going forward because you are not willing to do your job in a timely manner to protect my personal safety or my property/
You are advance warning now that I am going to do what is necessary to protect myself, and to protect my property with the caveat that I have no desire to cause another human being any harm whatsoever, and I don’t have any intention of purchasing a firearm Or any other weapon.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Bryan C. Gobin
The contents of this email message and any You give me 10 minutes attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.
Cc: <oscar.delatorre@santamonica.gov>, <Caroline.Torosis@santamonica.gov>, <jesse.zwick@santamonica.gov>, <christine.parra@santamonica.gov>, <gleam.davis@santamonica.gov>, <lana.negrete@santamonica.gov>, <phil.brock@santamonica.gov>, <council.mailbox@santamonica.gov>, <David.White@santamonica.gov>, <douglas.sloan@santamonica.gov>, <susan.cola@santamonica.gov>, <nicole.gougis@santamonica.gov>, <Artis.Williams@santamonica.gov>, <Maury.Sumlin@santamonica.gov>, <Darrick.Jacob@santamonica.gov>, <Richard.Verbeck@santamonica.gov>, <Candice.Cobarrubias@santamonica.gov>, <Saul.Rodriguez@santamonica.gov>, <Shaun.Cooney@santamonica.gov>, <Alfonso.Lozano@santamonica.gov>, <Douglas.Woodhams@santamonica.gov>, <William.Heric@santamonica.gov>, <Nicholas.Krueger@santamonica.gov>, <Sean.Fraser@santamonica.gov>, <Salvador.Lucio@santamonica.gov>, <Ryan.Gradle@santamonica.gov>, <Thomas.McLaughlin@santamonica.gov>, <Carlos.Jaen@santamonica.gov>, <Cody.Green@santamonica.gov>, <Raul.Flores@santamonica.gov>, <Scott.McGee@santamonica.gov>, <Roberto.Villegas@santamonica.gov>, <Lowell.Watson@santamonica.gov>, <Dean.Oshiro@santamonica.gov>, <Francisco.Franco@santamonica.gov>, <Michael.Federico@santamonica.gov>, <Roberto.Lucio@santamonica.gov>, <Francis.Marnell@santamonica.gov>, <Gerardo.Leyva@santamonica.gov>, <Scott.McGowan@santamonica.gov>, <Derek.Leone@santamonica.gov>, <Andrea@santamonica.gov>, <Tina.Greer@santamonica.gov>, <Scott.Matsuda@santamonica.gov>, <Adam.Gwartz@santamonica.gov>, <Blake.Cooper@santamonica.gov>, <Renaldi.Thruston@santamonica.gov>, <Lewis.Gilmour@santamonica.gov>, <Robert.Paschal@santamonica.gov>, <Jorge.Zendejas@santamonica.gov>, <Chad.Goodwin@santamonica.gov>, <Erika.Aklufi@santamonica.gov>, <Brent.Crafton@santamonica.gov>, <Jose.Rodriguez@santamonica.gov>, <Phillip.de@santamonica.gov>, <Susana.Wessels@santamonica.gov>, <Michael.Chun@santamonica.gov>, <Matthew.Rice@santamonica.gov>, <Jeffrey.Glaser@santamonica.gov>, <Michael.Boyd@santamonica.gov>, <Roy.Brown@santamonica.gov>, <Austin.Brown@santamonica.gov>, <Mario.Toti@santamonica.gov>, <Martin.Fine@santamonica.gov>, <Kermit.Hicks@santamonica.gov>
Re: hacker involved in spamhause ddns attack, largest attack on record at the time, Department of Justice lies about the Sony pictures hack with false attribution to North Korea, murder for EBT case, and white man privilege in Santa Monica.
(retired) Admiral John Kirby, spokesman, National Security Council:
May it please national security Council spokesperson John Kirby, to take note below of the national security issues related to the sentencing today of John Schiefer, who is wrongly convicted for murder in a crime of food stamps for murder for hire.
Please excuse typos because I’m using voice to text. My computer has been stolen.
Let me first address some personal issues:
1. Sometimes the personal and the professional converge in unexpected ways. Here I am making the case that Palestinians have the right to life and the right to exist. Then I have a situation where the Santa Monica Police Department and Santa Monica City Council have determined that I do not have the right to exist. They have denied me basic public services. And I strongly urge Admiral John Kirby, Spokesperson for the National Security Council to consider The message she is sending to the rest of the world about the contempt that the United States has for Palestinian life is the same message he is sending to domestic law enforcement about black lives not mattering, and indigent defendants lives not mattering, and most American lives not mattering if they happen to be on the wrong side of the thin blue line, which is increasingly most of America.
Let us discuss the national security issues.
###### National security council misrepresentations ####
National security council spokesperson, John Kirby, note the following:
My friend, John Schiefer, who is capable of putting one bit of data per second against a data center 100 data centers has been sentenced to 25 years to life today for a murder he did not commit. He had no motive. The claims made by the prosecutor are absolutely insane. They claim that he would want nearly maxed out credit cards When he is able to buy the FBI on record in botroast Commit fraud from the comfort of his own home, sitting in front of a keyboard. Why would a man who has no record of physical violence, and who had played poker with Elon musk Decide to go into the street level crime of murder for hire (for food stamps) for a trivial amount of money that is worth less than the value of the Gucci sneakers on his feet at the time of his arrest?
The prosecutors from the Los Angeles county district attorneys Are Shane Michael, Jillian O’Neill, And supervisor Mara mcilvain Who has a long history of abuse of prosecutorial discretion, and flat out fraud.
The theory of the case against Mr. John Schiefer is that he accepted a contract for murder for higher for the amount of less than $2000, for the purposes of helping haena Worthing Obtain a house that she was not even entitled to get, and that she knew was in foreclosure, and that she also knew her mother was only going to get a fixed amount less than $250,000 that would only happen if the sale of the home proceeded.
The prosecutors claim that Mr. Schiefer, who is aware of this situation, accepted a contract to murder The ex-husband of Debra Worthing, mother, Haena Worthing, Who all lived in this house that was about to be sold for the purposes of canceling the sale tha Haena continue to live in a house that she knew she had no title rights under the terms of the divorce already completed between her mother and her stepfather, and no ability to pay the hundred thousand dollars in taxes due on the house or the over $1 million mortgage still on the house under for foreclosure that was due to be sold shortly before Mr. Webster was killed and whose body was subsequently burned in the desert And easily discovered because it was not buried, and because Mr. Schiefer enabled there to be tracking of the journey, he took with Miss Worthing to the desert Because he believed it was very important that the family members be able to retrieve the body.
This is clearly a crazy story, but I think we know that given that Deborah, Worthing and Worthing had no assets and no income and other than high Worthing’s EBT (food stamps), The college educated and mentally ill and drug addicted Miss Worthing still had enough sense to know that she was not going to be able to cover the caring cost of nearly $14,000 per month on her stipend of government food stamps.
But again, this is the theory that we have a situation of murder for food stamps (EBT), because that is the only asset that Miss Worthing could provide to Mr. Schiefer, or anyone else in exchange for a contract killing.
Murder for food stamps to cover a $14,000 mortgage and for a $2.5 million house in Marina del Rey is the typical absurd Kind of theories presented by the Los Angeles county district . I should also add that the district attorney featured as state witness and LAPD criminologist who made the stunning Scientific discovery on the witness stand that skin has no DNA. Skin has no DNA. When asked by defense counsel on cross examination whether she was sure that skin had no DNA, the criminologist from the LAD affirmed again the new scientific discovery that human skin contains no DNA. Of course, this is nonsense. Anybody who watches any crime shows would know this criminologist made a ridiculous false claim. These are the kind of experts regularly touted by prosecution in the Los Angeles County criminal courts, which are a joke and a scam and a form of occupation.
Bullshit is the standard of evidence for the district attorney in Los Angeles County. When people hear that the conviction rate in the occupied territories in the scam Courts is 100% they think that number is too high.
When people hear that the conviction rate in Putin‘s Russia is 99% they think that number is too high.
But why does no one question that the conviction rate in federal criminal courts in the year 2022 was 99%?
Why does knowing the conviction rate in California that is damn close to 99%?
This story does sound preposterous and is clearly an example of a travesty of justice, but this is truly business as usual in Los Angeles County criminal courts, the largest criminal justice system of any county in the United States. Our corrupt law schools create a pipeline of new prosecutors like UCLA law graduate and deputy prosecutor Jillian O’Neill, who believes life sentences based on the absurdity of “Murder for Food Stamps” by a world reknown hacker is fair play.
Why don’t you give Jillian jackass a call to get her statements about why she lied during sentencing today in order to try to get an even longer sentence for Mr. Schiefer? Why don’t you ask her why she and her colleagues had a warrant executed against me for having written a defense of Mr. Schiefer that I shared with public officials and the press? What a trifling little b*itch she is. Ditto for Shane Michael, and for supervisor Mara Mcilvain, who is Hitler personified!!!
Why don’t you ask the Chief of the Bureau of Investigations why he continues to hold property of mine seized last May in a search and seizure but doesn’t have the integrity to return my property now that he has clearly decide after 7 months that I pose no imminent danger as alleged by the corrupt prosecution team lynching Mr. Schiefer and his girlfriend.
John Schiefer lost his white privilege when he Became an indigent defendant. That is enough to take away his white privilege and the court of Los Angeles county. You can look up the spamhause attack which was reported to be one of the largest in history to get a sense of what John Schiefer can do. You can ask the FBI on what their thoughts are on the matter.
Reference: DDoS attack against Spamhaus was reportedly the largest in history | Network World
You wanna know something about the Sony hack, you should know that John was consulted by the FBI about this hack, and determined that it was not from the North Koreans contrary to public statements made by President Obama, and by the US attorney for the central district of California. You can ask the FBI for their point of view on the matter, And why they lied to cover up the true source of the hack in this press release below.
Reference Press Release: North Korean Regime-Backed Programmer Charged With Conspiracy to Conduct Multiple Cyber Attacks and Intrusions | United States Department of Justice
The Department of Justice lied in this press release.
So are we to believe that there is some kind of North Korean super hacker who is the equivalent of throwing everything but the kitchen sink during a single quarter for a corporate firm Taking a hit all at once to get it over with?
We can talk about some other things as well regarding government misrepresentations. John and I spent quite a lot of time together in the same cell, which you have to imagine is almost a zero probability event, unless you consider the fact that I worked for ibm systems and the booking system for the LA County Jail runs on a main frame. Is that a coincidence? How else can you explain the near zero probability of two blockchain experts, being in the same cell at the same time, in jail were 80% of the inmates are non-white, and a tiny tiny fraction have college education. What is the odd that at the age 47 that I would be put in jail for the first time in my life, after having no criminal history whatsoever?
—###### *** ######—
Now, back to my personal intersection of my right to exist versus the Santa Monica Police Department, and the city council of Santa Monica, California, and the white male roommate who is seeking to frame me for the very crimes that he committed.
The email I received below from Antoine De Lartigue is textbook white male privilege. He is an example of what I call Karen xy, A reference, of course, to “Karen” Who called the cops on the black Mail birdwatcher in the park for no reason other than maliciousness.
So I have known exactly what Antoine De Lartigue has been up to for over a year and a half. He has to exploit my bogus criminal conviction and my Status as a racial minority for the purposes, of claiming that I am guilty of the very crimes that he is committed. It is An example of classic Zionist doublespeak. Whatever they say, is the opposite of the truth. Of course, Antoine is not a Zionist and not Jewish either but the tactics are exactly the same.
So I suggest Antoine on copy feel free to respond to the entire New York Times and Columbia law school and FBI making the case that he is not guilty as charged by me since I am the truth. That is my brand. www.Tulppp.com
I should also add that this fellow has no regard for the fact that I am trying to intervene to save lives. My asymmetric Psych op skills have caused people to lose control And make mistakes that can be exploited. I have a lot of health problems now, so I’m not at the top of my game. But I’m not a liar my brand is the truth. See the correspondence below regarding my sad, personal situation at the age of 50 where I have to fight for my right to exist.
thank you for your consideration in this matter, and please let genocide Joe Biden know that Those of us, on the other side of the thin, blue line, do not appreciate our president denying the humanity of other human beings, because that means genocide Joe denies our humanity as well
See email below from my roommate, Antoine De Lartigue, claiming he is a victim of his own wide privilege being challenged.
Warm regards, BRYAN Gobin
original gangster on the west side
—###### *** ######—
Re: Santa Monica Police Department incident number. 24-4883, Message from perpetrator Antoine De Lartigue below
Dear Sgt Goodwin and city Manager David Wright
Please take note of the email that I received from perpetrator Antoine De Lartigue insinuating that he is a victim as opposed to the perpetrator.
He claims that he is a victim of physical violence and threats and defamation.
You can skip to below the signature because I don’t want to trouble you reading too much. What is below *** Is my commentary to the press and to the district attorney candidates, and not relevant for your investigation or your response. Thank you for your assistance.
—###### *** ######—
Since he is a white male, I suppose you should hurry up and protect him from a man that is 10 years younger than him and that has physical disabilities and that is a foot shorter than he is.
Surely Santa Monica police should provide protection to the white male Who feels Threatened by my challenge, through peaceful and lawful means to deny him His white privilege that entitles him under your sponsorship to Act with impunity while engaged in criminal acts physically assault me and vandalize my property, and steal my property.
Since the Los Angeles district attorney challengers on copy are so concerned about crime Perhaps John Hatami will tweet demanding action for the white man’s protection or perhaps, Nathan Nochman Also known as Batman will come to The white man’s rescue. Surely we must protect white privilege in Los Angeles County and surely we must preserve apartheid in Los Angeles County. Surely the challenges will demand a response from District attorney George Gascon Who they regard as soft on crime.
Please do not protect the victim. Do your duty to protect apartheid regime.
See note below from aggressor Antoine Digue who is now the victim.
Bryan Gobin
Ph. (702) 358-7554
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 12:41 PM Antoine de Lartigue <antoinedelartigue@gmail.com> wrote:
Mr Bryan Gobin,
Your continuous actions to harass, threaten, physically assault and defame Antoine de Lartigue are punishable by California Law.
This is your notice to cease and desist all activity against Antoine de Lartigue, harassement, threats, physical assault, defamation, and all other actions punishable by California Law.
Antoine de Lartigue
To: <Mashhoud.Boroujerdi@santamonica.gov>, <Walter.Ramirez@santamonica.gov>
Cc: Press, Santa Monica PD, City Council, City Attorney---and LA DA, FBI, Deans of Law Schools, Law faculty
From: bryan gobin <bryan.gobin.unc@gmail.com>
Dear Officer Sal Boroujerdi,
You know you had me detained under BULLSHIT pretenses. YOu had enough info from me BEFORE we met based on our brief conversations to KNOW you had ZERO probable cause to harass me and have me locked up---not for jail but for a mental health evaluation--which I assure you, the doctor thought I was bonkers for going toe-to-toe with cops because cops are violent, barbaric, entitled, lawless thugs---like Zionists.
See new webpage---more to piss off the cops---they are not proud to have their numbers reported because they know are running a RACKET.
If you think you have a "criminal threat" based on my call to report an incident where Off. Walter Ramirez hung up the phone on me after I made the point to him that he has no clue what he's talking point, using my own conviction as an example which is posted on my website---then by all means, RELEASE THE TAPES TO THE PUBLIC--But your department Can't even find incident number from December 2023, let alone NON-incident related items like calls to dispatch. Pathetic. Pathetic, Pathetic. YOur department charges $30 just to begin digging through their own disorganized files.
And if you think you scare me with the possibility of Officer Ramirez testifying about B-52 USAF Jet Bombers on a call where he rudely hung up on me AFTER giving me misinformation due to his lack of training, then by all means---GO FOR PROSECUTION--
YOU APPARENTLY THINK IT'S CRAZY FOR ME DEMAND THE SERVICE THAT I AM ENTITLED TO, AND THAT YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING.
Enjoy the updates to the webpage...teachers v. cops--cops are running a union racket sucking up public resources and not doing a good job. Full stop. It's like the cops are on strike.
From: Value Veracity <valueveracity@gmail.com>
To: City Council, City Attorney, Chief of Police
Attention city council
I was detained for over 40 hours because Ramon Batista got his little panties, twisted because I made fun of his sorry ass service. He somehow thinks that arresting me is going to somehow make me feel more Grateful to his service.
Apparently the way to get some service, and Santa Monica is to make fun of the fact that the officer that came to assist and instead discriminated against me, in fact, has not paid his child support.
That is the way to get some “probable cause” for Ramon Batista to get off his ass.
Only when he has his little ego hurt by an officer, who makes the absurd claim that I’m going to blow up the FBI on coffee, which is absolutely ridiculous. Is there any attention whatsoever?
Serve and protect means, serve and protect their own asses.
--------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Pacific GrovePD <pacificgrovepd@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: LATIDE-Reporter on a deadline (Handling of Thefts-Santa Monica) Sgt Lozano - Grand Larceny Investigation / B. Gobin Incident# 24-4883.
To: <bryan.gobin@uncbusiness.net>
CC: Santa Monica Police Department
You can arrest me and detain me. I am not intimidated. Release the tapes where Ramirez hung up the phone. Probable cause means hurt cop feelings.
Release the tapes. Release your evidence. I call you for help and you try to threaten me for complaining about your lousy service. Think again if this is going to work for intimidating me.
Press on bcc
City council on bcc
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 1:56 AM bryan gobin <bryan.gobin.unc@gmail.com> wrote:
To:Mass Email to Police
My uncle died in the line of duty and my cousin is now a state trooper in Florida. I have many family members who have served in the Armed Forces, and some are law enforcement officers. I resent the treatment I have received by your department. Many staffers look for any excuse Not to do a damn thing. I find this conduct disgusting and revolting especially in light of the fact that Cali Cops are paid extraordinarily well---and your education programs are a racket Union College. University of San Diego---BS education---90 percent of credit for "life experience" where you act like jackassess. Let me also add that last year marked the death toll of firefighters dying from sickness related to working at the World Trade Center site equaling the number of firefighters that died that day. Read about Brooklyn firefighters. I know this because I was there and witnessed the South Tower fall. And Senator Rand Paul signed a $2 Trillion tax cut with enthusiasm but balked at funding the 9/11 victims fund. That's fcking plutocratic, anti-democratic, anti-American vile and disgusting conduct.
You have a job to do--Don't LIE to be about the criteria for probable cause or the penal code, which sergeants apparently do not fcking know.
Your record system is a public safety threat because you can't even pull goddamn incident reports at headquarters let alone when you are responding to a 911 service call. Your systems are terrible; this is a statewide problem; and it reflects the fact that the top brass in this state apparently suck--because they are having their dicks sucked by vendors like AXON which has put your lives in danger and civliian lives in dangers with their faulty products. I'd kill these Axon criminal motherfckers. Enjoy the link. http://tinyurl.com/tulppp-police-smpd
I should have asked for a Barista but I got a Batista. He wants a war. You got it...We're at War. You fck with my life You fck with my public safety. I will fck with anybody anywhere any fcking time who dares put my life at risk, and tells me between the lines that Ni'gga you ain't getting no service, and we'll treat you like fcking Ni'gga for daring to call us.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
To: <alphonso.lozano@santamonica.gov>, BRYAN Gobin (Personal-702) <bryan.gobin@uncbusiness.net>, Y Antoine De Lartigue <antoinedelartigue@gmail.com>, ramon Batista <Ramon.Batista@santamonica.gov>, <jorge.zendejas@santamonica.gov>, <attorney.mailbox@santamonica.gov>, <douglas.sloan@santamonica.gov>, <Scott.delcrognale@santamonica.gov>
Cc: City Council, City Attorney, District Attorney Los Angeles County
From: bryan gobin <bryan.gobin@uncbusiness.net>
Santa Monica PD et al---If there are any mistakes that I made on my website, particularly regarding John Alle or City Council Members or SMPD officers, such as Deadbeat dad beat cop Scott.delcrognale, please let me know by 5pm Tomorrow (saturday), Jan 20. Thanks in advance. I'll be trashing your performance on a global basis. You deserve credit for your Apartheid occupation and sense of entitlement.
see link.
http://tinyurl.com/tulppp-police-smpd
Dear Sgt Lozano,
I looked forward to hearing from you about the detectives being assigned to TWO incidences of LARCENY including incident #24-4883 and incident#(see your files) from December when I had reported property removal without my consent EXPRESSLY Denied,
Again, we had ONLY discussed assigning detectives to ONE out of TWO incidents. I wish for BOTH incidents to be addressed.
The 2nd incident occurred on 26 December if memory serves me correctly--FOUR officers eventually responded to this call and congregated in my living room. Later Sgt Zendejas on copy responded separately due to my 2nd call on account of receiving such poor service from your department that I feared for my own personal safety due to your responding officer's criminalizing the citizen calling for assistance by making presumptions that the white male perpetrator was more credible than the person calling for assistance.
Per our conversation , please take note of the following,
I have found my property in my apartment "hidden" underneath piles of DVDs in a chest of drawers in the same room in which they had "disappeared" resulting in my 911 call after making inquiries with my two roommates if they had any knowledge about the disappearance of my property in the living room between the hours of 5am and 8.30am
Per the references below, there was "probable cause" to believe that in the absence of forced entry, and the unlikely scenario that someone other than the suspect who had to the key to the apartment would have taken my property given recent calls in December about EXACTLY the same issue of Larceny, you DID in fact have probable cause to execute a search warrant-
Per the elements of Grand Larceny--which are included below for your reference,
I was deprived of use of my property for two days;
There was obvious INTENT to deprive me use of my property since the Suspect DENIED having taken my property, and any other unidentified Suspects would have presumably intended to deprive me of use
no one has claimed responsibility for having moved my property or 'hidden' my property where I would not reasonably find it had I not gone on a hunting expedition yesterday evening which result in a delightful recovery of property.
I have no idea about the whereabouts of my property.
See references below
California Penal Code § 487 defines “grand theft” as stealing more than $950 worth of personal property, real estate, money, or labor. Stealing $950 or less is treated as the lesser crime of petty theft.1
Grand theft also comprises stealing someone else’s property directly from their person or stealing their motor vehicle or firearm – no matter the monetary value.2
Grand theft is a wobbler.3 This means it can be either a misdemeanor or a felony:4
Grand theft charge
California penalties
Misdemeanor
Up to 1 year in jail
Felony
16 months, 2 years, or 3 years in jail
Examples of grand theft
· Shoplifting a piece of jewelry that has a $1,000 price tag,
· Embezzling hundreds of thousands of dollars from an employer, and
· Breaking into a house and stealing electronics worth several thousand dollars.
Shoplifting at a high-end store can easily invite California grand theft charges.
Legal defenses to grand theft
· You did not intend to steal,
· The allegedly stolen property actually belonged to you,
· The person who owned the item consented to you taking it, and/or
· Someone falsely accused you.
In order to help you better understand the law, our California criminal defense attorneys will address the following:
· 1. What is the legal definition of grand theft in California?
o 1.2. Theft by false pretense
· 2. How does grand theft differ from petty theft?
· 3. What are the penalties for a Penal Code 487 PC conviction?
· 4. How can I fight the charges?
· 5. PC 487 Grand theft and related offenses
If after reading this article, you have additional questions, we invite you to contact us at Shouse Law Group.
Penal Code 487 PC defines grand theft as stealing property valued at more than $950.00.
There are different ways you can commit grand theft. The elements of the offense depend on the kind of grand theft that the prosecutor is charging.
Simply put, the form of theft known as “larceny” occurs when you physically carry off another person’s tangible property.
The legal definition of grand theft by larceny is:
· 1. You took possession of property owned by someone else;
· 2. You did not have permission from the owner to take the property;
· 3. When you took the property, you intended either
o to deprive the owner of it permanently, or
o to take it away from the owner for a period of time long enough that they would be deprived of a significant portion of the value or enjoyment of it; AND
· You moved the property (this can be a very short distance) and kept it for a period of time (however brief).5
Simple shoplifting cases can lead to charges of grand theft by larceny if the total value of the stolen items exceeds $950.00.6
3.1. “Wobbler” penalties
California Penal Code 487 PC “grand theft” is, in most cases, a wobbler. This means that the prosecutor may charge this offense as either a misdemeanor or a felony.24
If you are convicted of grand theft as a misdemeanor, you face up to one (1) year in county jail.25
If you are convicted of grand theft as a felony, you face:
· felony probation with up to one year of county jail time, or
· sixteen (16) months, two (2) years or three (3) years in county jail (unless the theft was of a firearm).26
The decision to file charges for misdemeanor grand theft or felony grand theft is up to the prosecutor’s discretion. They will usually base the decision on
1. the circumstances of your case, and
2. your criminal history.
From <https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/defense/penal-code/487/#2>
From <https://www.justia.com/criminal/docs/calcrim/1800/1801/>
If you conclude that the defendant committed a theft, you must decide
whether the crime was grand theft or petty theft.
[The defendant committed petty theft if (he/she) stole property [or
services] worth $950 or less.]
[The defendant committed grand theft if the value of the property [or
services] is more than $950.]
[Theft of property from the person is grand theft if the value of the
property is more than $950. Theft is from the person if the property
taken was in the clothing of, on the body of, or in a container held or
carried by, that person.]
[Theft of (an automobile/a horse/ <insert other item listed in
statute>) is grand theft if the value of the property is more than $950.]
[Theft of a firearm is grand theft.]
[Theft of (fruit/nuts/ <insert other item listed in statute>)
worth more than $950 is grand theft.]
[Theft of (fish/shellfish/aquacultural products/ <insert other
item listed in statute>) worth more than $950 is grand theft if (it/they)
(is/are) taken from a (commercial fishery/research operation).]
[The value of <insert relevant item enumerated in Pen. Code,
§ 487(b)(1)(B)> may be established by evidence proving that on the day
of the theft, the same items of the same variety and weight as those
stolen had a wholesale value of more than $950.]
[The value of (property/services) is the fair (market value of the
property/market wage for the services performed).]
<Fair Market Value - Generally>
[Fair market value is the highest price the property would reasonably
have been sold for in the open market at the time of, and in the general
location of, the theft.]
<Fair Market Value - Urgent Sale>
[Fair market value is the price a reasonable buyer and seller would agree
on if the buyer wanted to buy the property and the seller wanted to sell
it, but neither was under an urgent need to buy or sell.]
The People have the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that
the theft was grand theft rather than a lesser crime. If the People have
From <https://www.justia.com/criminal/docs/calcrim/1800/1801/>
484. (a) Every person who shall feloniously steal, take, carry,
lead, or drive away the personal property of another, or who shall
fraudulently appropriate property which has been entrusted to him or
her, or who shall knowingly and designedly, by any false or
fraudulent representation or pretense, defraud any other person of
money, labor or real or personal property, or who causes or procures
others to report falsely of his or her wealth or mercantile character
and by thus imposing upon any person, obtains credit and thereby
fraudulently gets or obtains possession of money, or property or
obtains the labor or service of another, is guilty of theft. In
determining the value of the property obtained, for the purposes of
this section, the reasonable and fair market value shall be the test,
and in determining the value of services received the contract price
shall be the test. If there be no contract price, the reasonable
and going wage for the service rendered shall govern. For the
purposes of this section, any false or fraudulent representation or
pretense made shall be treated as continuing, so as to cover any
money, property or service received as a result thereof, and the
complaint, information or indictment may charge that the crime was
committed on any date during the particular period in question. The
hiring of any additional employee or employees without advising each
of them of every labor claim due and unpaid and every judgment that
the employer has been unable to meet shall be prima facie evidence of
intent to defraud.
From <https://law.justia.com/codes/california/2007/pen/484-502.9.html> a
To: Ashley Allen <ashley.allen@santamonica.gov>, <David.White@santamonica.gov>, Douglas A. Murray <dmurray@da.lacounty.gov>, <Ramon.Batista@santamonica.gov>, Richard Elias <richard.elias@santamonica.gov>, Wing, David A. <DAWing@lasd.org>, Y Antoine De Lartigue <antoinedelartigue@gmail.com>, <alphonso.lozano@santamonica.gov>, bryan gobin <bryan.gobin.unc@gmail.com>, <rarcos@da.lacounty.gov>
From: bryan gobin <bryan.gobin@uncbusiness.net>
Dear Sgt lozano
The thief who stole my electronics did in fact, acknowledge yesterday that he did take my electronics. Specifically, in my last verbal encounter with him when I asked him to return my property, he said “ No, fuck you bitch, fuck you bitch.”
This Was repeated I’m not sure how many times, but the bottom line is that this is acknowledgment of the theft that was perpetuated against me.
I do hope you’re able to promptly recover my property.
If you have any other questions, feel free to call. The thief is on copy.
Bryan Gobin
Ph. (702) 358-7554
Connect with me on LinkedIn
De Lartigue: Steals Diabetes Medication
Antoine De Lartigue: Life of Larceny, Violence & Harassment
